.
* radical sapphoq

Sunday, May 06, 2007

SANCTUARY 5/6/07

San Francisco Mayor Newscom has made it clear that he does not want federal raids against illegal immigrants carried out in his city. He wants San Francisco to remain a sanctuary [as declared in 1989.] The problem remains that some legal immigrants are being snatched up and temporarily terrified. If that is indeed the problem, then the feds need to firm up their investigative units so that doesn't happen as much. There is no sanctity in hiding criminals. Prevention of natural consequences for bad behavior is enabling, illegal in this case, and probably downright unholy.

radical sapphoq

Labels: , ,

Friday, March 30, 2007

BLOGS 4 BORDERS 3/30/07

I am a proud member of Bloggers Against Illegal Immigration.
I also intend to join Blogs 4 Borders.
The url for that is at: http://blogs4borders.blogspot.com/
Go check 'em out.


radical sapphoq

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, December 24, 2006

CHANNEL PLOTTING 12/24/06

Merry Christmas to our British allies who have a significant Muslim minority (200 suspected terrorist networks and 1600 Brits are being actively monitored for same) living there. Word is out courtesy of the C.I.A. that the Channel tunnel with its swirling rush of trains is next to go. Travelers are packing the trains in record numbers due to the fogginess settling in around airports causing flights to be delayed or canceled. Perhaps Virgil Goode isn't so crazy after all with his thoughts on limiting immigration of Muslims from the Middle East to the U.S.A.

Metro Police Chief Ian Blair is in disagreement, saying only that he is unaware of any specific plot during the Christmas holidays targeting England. That puts him in notable company with Michael Moore and Dr. Rowan Williams.

It is believed that the Channel plot is being coordinated from Pakistan and possibly involves Western Europeans of Pakistani descent. A separate plot targeting a yet unnamed European country for repeated attacks by April 2007 is being coordinated from Syria and Iraq.

radical sapphoq

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, December 22, 2006

GOOD FOR GOODE 12/22/06

Rep. Virgil H. Goode Jr., a Republican Congressman is standing by his position on immigration in spite of a fervor caused by his recent remarks regarding the plans of a Congressman from Minnesota to be sworn into office using the Koran. The congressmen are sworn in as a group. Individual congressmen may elect to also participate in a private ceremonial swearing-in.

Goode wants illegal immigration to be cut down to zero and he wants legal immigration to be cut back. He is opposed to any more immigration of Muslims from Middle Eastern countries. One pro-Muslim organization based in the U.S. sent him an English translation of the Koran. It was suggested that he read a specific verse relating that people and nations were not created to hate each other.

I suggest that all the people screaming about this read the entire Koran. Then goto http://www.outragedmoderates.org/, click on the Government Document Library, find and download the chapters from a terrorist training manual there and read them word for word. Then come back and state honestly that Islam is peace-loving and so was the founder.

For the text of the letter which Rep. Goode sent to his constituents, goto: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,237990,00.html

radical sapphoq says:
I don't care what book a member of congress uses to swear on when taking office. I do care about a future possibility of Muslims becoming a majority in the United States and/or in public office. While I remain an avid supporter of separation of church and state, I also totally support Rep. Goode on his position on immigration. Good for him for not backing down! If that makes me a bigot, then so be.


radical sapphoq



http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/12/21/quran.congress/

http://www.charlottesvillenewsplex.tv/news/headlines/4994466.html
http://www.charlottesvillenewsplex.tv/news/headlines/4983096.html

http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/3798

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/
chi-0612220053dec22,1,4809344.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed


http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/editorials/
articles/2006/12/22/an_open_house_for_all/


http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-muslim22dec22,1,6491840.story?
coll=la-news-politics-national&track=crosspromo


http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/politics/4419910.html

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, December 03, 2006

TESTING, TESTING 12/3/06

On Thursday, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Department released the 144 sample civics questions of the new standardized test for citizenship. [There will be two other parts-- reading items, and writing items.] Applicants must correctly answer six out of ten questions in the civics section. Ten cities in four states, chosen for distribution of legal immigrants, will pilot the new test beginning in 2007. The revised test has been at least five years in the making and included input from various experts.

Currently, states use their own designed tests. The tests are not standardized. The twin aims of the new test is to implement the same test nationally and to provide a test which encourages the understanding of democratic concepts rather than rote memorization. On both levels, the sample test released on Thursday does admirably well.

The pilot is not without its' detractors. Fred Tsao of the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights objects. He characterized some questions as being "off the wall." He also thought that the fee for applying for citizenship [currently $400.00 USB] is too high and he is opposed to raising the fee. [Fred Tsao's organization also puts out a pamphlet detailing how "undocumented students" can get financial aid to attend state colleges in Illinois. Currently, the site has some ftp-related problems and some of the links are broken. Typing them into the browser may get you to other parts of the website or it may not.]

Who is Fred Tsao? Well, I am not really sure. He used to work for the ACLU maybe. He certainly is an outspoken guy who is currently living in soundbytes which delineate his aversion to illegal immigrants having fewer 'rights' than the rest of us, to illegal immigrants having to take responsibility for the consequences of getting caught for crossing the border illegally, to test reform which might require a civics engineer from India to know what the current minimum wage in this country is. To Fred Tsao, the code word for illegal is "undocumented." The governor of Illinois is a good guy in his camp cuz said governor wants undocumented immigrants to attend state colleges there at the state's expense. The Illinois governor may also be planning a run for the 2008 presidency. Groan.

Fred Tsao does not like the pilot test. That is abundantly clear. I don't cotton well to people of any nationality crossing our borders illegally and then whining because they are making eleven bucks an hour in a restaurant in New York City and cannot get in on their employer's sponsered healthcare plan for lack of a valid social security number. Perhaps joining the parade of the uncounteds in Massachusetts or Illinois would prove more appealing. Or military service as a path to citizenship in order to avoid taking the test. At any rate, my dad [an American son of two legal immigrants] told me "Anything worth having is worth working for." Fred, are you listening?

radical sapphoq

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/16148147.htm


http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/testing-times-for-those-seeking-us-citizenship/
2006/12/01/1164777791826.html


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/
chi-0612010087dec01,1,5333633.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed


http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-12-01-citizenship_x.htm


http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-12-01-citizenship-chart_x.htm

http://www.zeenews.com/znnew/articles.asp?aid=339442&sid=WOR

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/4371296.html


http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/
menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/
?vgnextoid=dcf5e1df53b2f010VgnVCM1000000ecd190aRCRD


http://www.icirr.org/


http://docket.medill.northwestern.edu/archives/003275.php


http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0705/p01s03-usmi.html


Labels: ,

Thursday, November 16, 2006

USING A SEVEN YEAR OLD 11/16/06

Parts of the world are all a-raged with the story of Saul Arellano, a 7 year old American second-grader and his illegal Mexican immigrant mother, Elvira. She crossed the border illegally in 1997, was sent back to Michoacan, crossed again, got pregnant at some point or another, and gave birth to Saul in Oregon. Sometime after his birth, she and her son moved to Chicago. She was scheduled to be deported back in August but instead of surrendering to authorities, she and her son began living in a storefront church, the Adalberto United Methodist Church.

The trouble had begun with her job as a cleaning woman at the O'Hare Airport. That is how she was found out. She was arrested in December of 2001. After an appeal or two-- who paid for her lawyer?-- she was ordered to report in August of 2006. That is five years almost, well, four and three/quarters, that she remained illegally in Chicago where she still is. The immigration department has not gone to the church to pick her up. They could. But no one has. Why not? Saul is "in therapy" because he supposedly has nightmares about his mother being sent back to Mexico. Who is paying for that?

Elvira says that her son wants to fight for her to stay in Chicago. Saul says he does not want to live in Mexico because he does not want to leave his school and playmates behind. A small contigent of American let-the-illegals-stay activists were with Saul when he went to the Mexican Congress. Are they the ones who helped him make the journey without his mother? Well, no. There is a man who did. His name is Emma Lozano. Lozano is the executive director of Centro Sin Fronteras, an immigrants-rights group in Chi-town. There is also a "sanctuary movement" to content with over here as well. They help illegals stay. How? By relocating them rather than allowing them to get caught and be deported? Did they buy the new tan suit that Saul was wearing when he was speaking to the 500 deputies in the Mexican Congress on Tuesday? Saul and Elvira were depending upon friends to supply food to them while at the storefront church. Elvira still is at the church as far as we know.

Little Saul spoke to the Mexican Congress [Chamber of Deputies] and the result was that the folks there are now asking President Bush 41 to forget about deporting her. They are also asking, in the interest of fairness of course, that any other illegals who are parents of children born here also be allowed to stay and not be deported. In practical terms, that means the illegal parentals of somewhere between 3 million and 4.9 billion kids [depending upon whose estimate one believes] who are also in Saul Arellano's situation would be allowed to stay.

Mom says that deporting her would deprive her son Saul of his rights as an American citizen. Hmmm. What rights would those be? The right to sponge off of our tax money? Oh, I forgot, she had been working. With a fake social security number but no matter. She was working. I should not pick on her for that. Nor for wanting the best for her son. After all, if she is intent upon little Saul receiving an American education and an American upbringing, she could leave him with one of those oh so helpful friends.

Oh, and before I forget, Elvira is not an illegal immigrant-- she is an uncounted immigrant and also an immigrant activist. Maybe I should relocate to Mexico without being counted and have a kid there while I'm at it.

radical sapphoq


http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2006/11/14/news/nation/08_22_7411_13_06.txt

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/world/4332027.html
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2006/11/16/2003336580
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/
la-fg-boy15nov15,0,4430315.story?coll=la-home-headlines

http://www.kpvi.com/index.cfm?page=nbcheadlines.cfm&ID=37661

Labels: